H.E. Parker

41 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

H.E. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Animal Science and Zoology 187
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 198
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 136
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 38
  • Parasitology 22
Replace Harold O. Goodman with:
Harold O. Goodman United States
Rosemary Schraer United States
ROBERT W. BATES United States
B. D. Stacy Australia
Albamaria Parmeggiani Italy
J. Stanton King United States
Knut-Jan Andersen Norway
Mehmet Kaya Türkiye
Marjorie M. Nelson United States
Takashi Makita Japan
H.E. Parker relative to Harold O. Goodman United States Harold O. Goodman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.1×
Harold O. Goodman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.E. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.E. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.E. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.E. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.E. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.E. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.E. Parker. The network helps show where H.E. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.E. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.E. Parker Line = papers co-authored together H.E. Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
N-isopropyl-[123I] p-iodoamphetamine: single-pass brain uptake and washout; binding to brain synaptosomes; and localization in dog and monkey brain.
1980184
2 195651
3 196650
4 196948
5 196631
6 196531
7 197427
8 196527
9 196025
10 195921
11 196121
12 196921
13 196316
14 196413
15 195911
16 195711
17 196910
18 196010
19 196210
20 19599

About H.E. Parker

H.E. Parker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Biochemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (11 papers), Trace Elements in Health (5 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (5 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (4 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (4 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (3 papers), Fluoride Effects and Removal (3 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (187 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (198 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (136 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (38 citations) and Parasitology (22 citations). H.E. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J.C. Rogler, W. M. Beeson, H. S. Winchell, W Horst, Leon D. Braun, William H. Oldendorf, Robert S. Hattner, F. N. Andrews, Robert B. Rucker and William H. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Journal of Nutrition, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Animal Science and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact