He Lin

742 citations
41 papers · 575 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

He Lin

36 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

He Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 420
  • Condensed Matter Physics 252
  • Accounting 147
  • Materials Chemistry 146
  • Strategy and Management 38
Replace Armando Galluzzi with:
Armando Galluzzi Italy
Zhaoshun Gao China
Takahiko Kawaguchi Japan
M. Vignolo Italy
Sevda Avcı Türkiye
Chiheng Dong China
Xiaolei Yi China
Liwen Tan China
Chung‐Chieh Chang Taiwan
He Lin relative to Armando Galluzzi Italy Armando Galluzzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Armando Galluzzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by He Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of He Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by He Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites He Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by He Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by He Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by He Lin. The network helps show where He Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside He Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with He Lin Line = papers co-authored together He Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201959
2 201457
3 202438
4 201436
5 201434
6 201534
7 201327
8 201327
9 201326
10 201522
11 201520
12 201320
13 201618
14 201918
15 201517
16 202416
17 201715
18 201313
19 201311
20 20139

About He Lin

He Lin is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Accounting, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron-based superconductors research (22 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (17 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (12 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (3 papers), Dielectric properties of ceramics (3 papers) and Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (420 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (252 citations), Accounting (147 citations), Materials Chemistry (146 citations) and Strategy and Management (38 citations). He Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chao Yao, Yanwei Ma, Dongliang Wang, Haitao Zhang, Qianjun Zhang, Xianping Zhang, Satoshi Awaji, Kazuo Watanabe, Chiheng Dong and Youfu Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, Scientific Reports, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics and Scripta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact