Hazel Colyer

438 citations
15 papers · 322 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Hazel Colyer

15 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Hazel Colyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 19
  • Research and Theory 8
  • General Health Professions 163
  • Public Administration 25
  • Health Information Management 12
Replace Ashley N. Muchow with:
Ashley N. Muchow United States
Murray Lough United Kingdom
Lyndon Morley Canada
Francine Borduas Canada
Rebecca Foster United Kingdom
JoAnn Mick United States
Jayne Wright United Kingdom
Eunice S. King United States
Carolyn Hope Smeltzer United States
Kristine Martin‐McDonald Australia
Hazel Colyer relative to Ashley N. Muchow United States Ashley N. Muchow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Ashley N. Muchow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Colyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Colyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Colyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Colyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Colyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Colyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Colyer. The network helps show where Hazel Colyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Colyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hazel Colyer Line = papers co-authored together Hazel Colyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199971
2 199649
3
The theory - practice relationship in interprofessional education
200546
4 200044
5 200435
6 200033
7 200710
8 20089
9 19995
10 20095
11 19994
12 20064
13 20023
14 20093
15
Demystifying research--issues in questionnaire design.
19901

About Hazel Colyer

Hazel Colyer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Surgery, having authored 15 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (19 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), General Health Professions (163 citations), Public Administration (25 citations) and Health Information Management (12 citations). Hazel Colyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Murray Smith, Sara Faithfull, C. Meredith, Bleddyn Jones, Catharine West, Peter Hoskin, John Dobbs and A L McKenzie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Palliative Nursing, British Journal of Radiology, Radiography and Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact