Harsh Bhatia

35 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Harsh Bhatia
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 106
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 147
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 101
  • Biophysics 34
  • Computational Mechanics 120
Replace Scott B. Baden with:
Scott B. Baden United States
Michael Mascagni United States
Ingrid Hotz Germany
Aaron Knoll United States
Stanley Seibert United States
Jan Westerholm Finland
David M. Beazley United States
Julien Tierny France
Per Lötstedt Sweden
Andreas Klöckner United States
Harsh Bhatia relative to Scott B. Baden United States Scott B. Baden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Scott B. Baden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harsh Bhatia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harsh Bhatia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harsh Bhatia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harsh Bhatia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harsh Bhatia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harsh Bhatia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harsh Bhatia. The network helps show where Harsh Bhatia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Harsh Bhatia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harsh Bhatia Line = papers co-authored together Harsh Bhatia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017213
2 2012170
3 202048
4 201940
5 201438
6 201830
7 201128
8 202124
9 201422
10 202020
11 202319
12 201718
13 201118
14 201317
15 202216
16 202116
17 201816
18 201915
19 201912
20 201411

About Harsh Bhatia

Harsh Bhatia is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (11 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (6 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (6 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (4 papers) and Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (106 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (147 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (101 citations), Biophysics (34 citations) and Computational Mechanics (120 citations). Harsh Bhatia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Peer‐Timo Bremer, Valerio Pascucci, Helgi I. Ingólfsson, Timothy S. Carpenter, Felice C. Lightstone, ‪Siewert J. Marrink, Peter Lindström, Guoning Chen, Joshua A. Levine and Attila Gyulassy. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Computer Graphics Forum, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of Computational Chemistry and Computational Geometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact