Harriet Smith
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 9
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 7
- Co-authors
- Kathryn Fackrell (10 shared papers)Deborah A. Hall (6 shared papers)Eithne Heffernan (1 shared paper)Haúla F. Haider (3 shared papers)Adele Horobin (3 shared papers)Birgit Mazurek (3 shared papers)Alain Londero (3 shared papers)Veronica Kennedy (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trends in Hearing (2 papers)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Autism Research (1 paper)Research Involvement and Engagement (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Harriet Smith
15 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sensory Systems 124
- Cognitive Neuroscience 127
- Speech and Hearing 42
- Neurology 51
- Sociology and Political Science 104
Countries citing papers authored by Harriet Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Harriet Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harriet Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harriet Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harriet Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harriet Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harriet Smith. The network helps show where Harriet Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Harriet Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 14 | Using expressive writing as an intervention to improve postnatal wellbeing | 2015 | 1 |
| 15 | Interpersonal trust and cooperative behavior in a strategic alliance | 2010 | 1 |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 |
About Harriet Smith
Harriet Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (124 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations), Speech and Hearing (42 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (104 citations). Harriet Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Fackrell, Deborah A. Hall, Eithne Heffernan, Haúla F. Haider, Adele Horobin, Birgit Mazurek, Alain Londero, Veronica Kennedy, Derek J. Hoare and J Barry. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Hearing, JAMA Network Open, BMJ Open, Autism Research and Research Involvement and Engagement.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.