Harold Langsam
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 14
- Philosophy 13
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 4
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 2
- Co-authors
- Jules L. Coleman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Erkenntnis (4 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Metaphilosophy (2 papers)Acta Analytica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Harold Langsam
19 papers receiving 143 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- History and Philosophy of Science 45
- Philosophy 99
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 79
- General Psychology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Harold Langsam
This map shows the geographic impact of Harold Langsam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold Langsam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold Langsam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harold Langsam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold Langsam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold Langsam. The network helps show where Harold Langsam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Harold Langsam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 5 | How to Combat Nihilism: Reflections on Nietzsche's Critique of Morality | 1997 | 11 |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Harold Langsam
Harold Langsam is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Philosophy (99 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Harold Langsam has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jules L. Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Metaphilosophy and Acta Analytica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.