Hao‐Chieh Lin

843 citations
16 papers · 648 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Hao‐Chieh Lin

15 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers

Hao‐Chieh Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 301
  • Strategy and Management 244
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 87
  • Accounting 107
  • Leadership and Management 10
Replace Stephen W Nason with:
Stephen W Nason Hong Kong
Keiko Toya Japan
Tung‐Chun Huang Taiwan
Kenneth Cafferkey Malaysia
Dorothea Roumpi United States
Maria Carmen Galang Canada
Marc Ohana France
Willie E. Hopkins United States
Zhenyao Cai China
Nemanja Berber Serbia
Hao‐Chieh Lin relative to Stephen W Nason Hong Kong Stephen W Nason's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Stephen W Nason · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hao‐Chieh Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hao‐Chieh Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao‐Chieh Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao‐Chieh Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hao‐Chieh Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao‐Chieh Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao‐Chieh Lin. The network helps show where Hao‐Chieh Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Hao‐Chieh Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hao‐Chieh Lin Line = papers co-authored together Hao‐Chieh Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2010159
2 2003150
3 201472
4 200667
5 201651
6 200849
7 202022
8 201020
9 202019
10 201816
11 201811
12 20216
13 20104
14 20221
15 20231
16 20250

About Hao‐Chieh Lin

Hao‐Chieh Lin is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Gender Studies, Accounting and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (301 citations), Strategy and Management (244 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (87 citations), Accounting (107 citations) and Leadership and Management (10 citations). Hao‐Chieh Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ing‐Chung Huang, Ming‐Jer Chen, John G. Michel, Chih‐Ting Shih, Chih‐Hsun Chuang, Sheng‐Tsung Hou, Pei‐Chun Lin, Chia‐Yen Chiu, Cheri L. Ostroff and Erik Paolo S. Capistrano. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Perspectives, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Asian Business & Management, Journal of Business Research and Strategic Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact