Hannah Limerick

593 citations
15 papers · 479 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hannah Limerick

14 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers

Hannah Limerick
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Human-Computer Interaction 194
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 281
  • Social Psychology 111
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Replace Jules Françoise with:
Jules Françoise France
Imtiaj Ahmed Finland
Jelle van Dijk Netherlands
Tanya R. Jonker United States
Fangtian Ying China
Oğuz ‘Oz’ Buruk Finland
Joanna Bergström Denmark
Reto Wettach Germany
Nuno Otero Sweden
Samantha L. Finkelstein United States
Hannah Limerick relative to Jules Françoise France Jules Françoise's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jules Françoise · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Limerick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Limerick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Limerick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Limerick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Limerick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Limerick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Limerick. The network helps show where Hannah Limerick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Limerick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah Limerick Line = papers co-authored together Hannah Limerick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014174
2 201549
3
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
201546
4 201945
5 201931
6 201924
7 201822
8 202220
9 202015
10 202015
11 202113
12 201912
13 20159
14 20224
15 20150

About Hannah Limerick

Hannah Limerick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Mechanical Engineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (10 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (2 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (194 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (281 citations), Social Psychology (111 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Hannah Limerick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include James W. Moore, David Coyle, Orestis Georgiou, Jörg Müller, Richard E. Hayden, David J. Beattie, William Frier, Damien Ablart, Marianna Obrist and Gary Burnett. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Lecture notes in computer science, ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) and Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact