Hajime Ando

44 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Hajime Ando
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Modeling and Simulation 35
  • Health 61
  • Clinical Psychology 48
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 3
  • Infectious Diseases 36
Replace Mohammad Hayatun Nabi with:
Mohammad Hayatun Nabi Bangladesh
Lori A. Magda United States
Terkuma Chia Nigeria
Mohsen Poursadeqiyan Iran
Francesco Esposito Italy
Mustapha Amoadu Ghana
Sarah Musa Qatar
Elizabeth D. Nesoff United States
Cathy Rice United Kingdom
Hajime Ando relative to Mohammad Hayatun Nabi Bangladesh Mohammad Hayatun Nabi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mohammad Hayatun Nabi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hajime Ando

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hajime Ando's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hajime Ando with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hajime Ando more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hajime Ando

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hajime Ando. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hajime Ando. The network helps show where Hajime Ando may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hajime Ando, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hajime Ando Line = papers co-authored together Hajime Ando links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202157
2 202117
3 202211
4 202110
5 20219
6 20228
7 20207
8 20166
9 20206
10 20225
11 20145
12 20195
13 20225
14 20225
15 20195
16 20224
17 20224
18 20224
19 20214
20 20234

About Hajime Ando

Hajime Ando is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (16 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (11 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (11 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (9 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (5 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (35 citations), Health (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (48 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (3 citations) and Infectious Diseases (36 citations). Hajime Ando has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yoshihisa Fujino, Seiichiro Tateishi, Tomohisa Nagata, Kazunori Ikegami, Ayako Hino, Shinya Matsuda, Akira Ogami, Mayumi Tsuji, Tomohiro Ishimaru and Mayumi Tsuji. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Health, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Frontiers in Public Health, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact