Hajar Ebrahim

450 citations
17 papers · 236 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Hajar Ebrahim

17 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Hajar Ebrahim
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 190
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 157
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 103
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 42
Replace Wolfgang Wieland with:
Wolfgang Wieland Germany
Jonathan Sorce United States
Johannes Tambornino France
John Ellis Switzerland
A. Khvedelidze Russia
Jens Mund Brazil
Sudip Ghosh India
Philip A. Tuckey United Kingdom
Ivano Basile Germany
Mariana Carrillo González United States
Hajar Ebrahim relative to Wolfgang Wieland Germany Wolfgang Wieland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Wolfgang Wieland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hajar Ebrahim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hajar Ebrahim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hajar Ebrahim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hajar Ebrahim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hajar Ebrahim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hajar Ebrahim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hajar Ebrahim. The network helps show where Hajar Ebrahim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Hajar Ebrahim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hajar Ebrahim Line = papers co-authored together Hajar Ebrahim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200634
2 200933
3
Black Holes, Qubits and Octonions
201332
4 200827
5 201515
6 201413
7 200112
8 202012
9 201612
10 201311
11 200510
12 20187
13 20166
14 20234
15 20134
16 20163
17 20171

About Hajar Ebrahim

Hajar Ebrahim is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (1 paper), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (1 paper) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (190 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (157 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (103 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (42 citations). Hajar Ebrahim has collaborated with scholars based in Iran, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Duff, L. Borsten, D. Dahanayake, W. Rubens, Mohsen Alishahiha, John Scopes, Adrienne M. Flanagan and M. A. Horton. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact