W. Rubens

508 citations
10 papers · 286 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

W. Rubens

10 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

W. Rubens
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 177
  • Computational Mathematics 7
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 144
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 112
  • Algebra and Number Theory 24
Replace D. Dahanayake with:
D. Dahanayake United Kingdom
Harold Erbin France
Michael Faux United States
Philippe Spindel Belgium
Giulio Salvatori United States
Geoff Penington United States
Gábor Sárosi United States
Ben Ruijl Netherlands
Heinrich Saller Germany
Jürgen Tolksdorf Germany
W. Rubens relative to D. Dahanayake United Kingdom D. Dahanayake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D. Dahanayake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Rubens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Rubens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Rubens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Rubens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Rubens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Rubens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Rubens. The network helps show where W. Rubens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside W. Rubens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Rubens Line = papers co-authored together W. Rubens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201078
2 200951
3 200933
4
Black Holes, Qubits and Octonions
201332
5 200827
6 201124
7 201219
8 201019
9 20092
10 20121

About W. Rubens

W. Rubens is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 10 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (2 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1 paper) and Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (177 citations), Computational Mathematics (7 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (144 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (112 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (24 citations). W. Rubens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Duff, L. Borsten, D. Dahanayake, Alessio Marrani, Hajar Ebrahim and S. Ferrara. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Fortschritte der Physik, Physical Review A, The European Physical Journal Plus and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact