Hai‐Ye Li

543 citations
57 papers · 446 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hai‐Ye Li

52 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Hai‐Ye Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Inorganic Chemistry 282
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 241
  • Materials Chemistry 226
  • Oncology 87
  • Spectroscopy 51
Replace Marek Weselski with:
Marek Weselski Poland
Pratibha Kapoor India
Ng Seik Weng Malaysia
Yishan Song China
Julia Werner Germany
Jian‐Chen Geng China
Nannan Bai China
Cui-Hong He China
J.M. Knaust United States
Edward P. Zovinka United States
Hai‐Ye Li relative to Marek Weselski Poland Marek Weselski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Marek Weselski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hai‐Ye Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hai‐Ye Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hai‐Ye Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hai‐Ye Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hai‐Ye Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hai‐Ye Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hai‐Ye Li. The network helps show where Hai‐Ye Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hai‐Ye Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hai‐Ye Li Line = papers co-authored together Hai‐Ye Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201675
2 200931
3 201525
4 201225
5 202023
6 201518
7 202118
8 201918
9 201514
10 201613
11 201813
12 202112
13 202211
14 202211
15 200811
16 201310
17 20149
18 20198
19 20178
20 20227

About Hai‐Ye Li

Hai‐Ye Li is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Oncology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 57 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (38 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (33 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (16 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (15 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (9 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (9 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers) and Crystallography and molecular interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (282 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (241 citations), Materials Chemistry (226 citations), Oncology (87 citations) and Spectroscopy (51 citations). Hai‐Ye Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Fu‐Ping Huang, He‐Dong Bian, Peng-Fei Yao, Qing Yu, Fu‐Pei Liang, Hua‐Hong Zou, Yi‐Min Jiang, Wei‐Yin Sun, Kai Wang and Kun Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Crystal Growth & Design, Inorganic Chemistry, New Journal of Chemistry, RSC Advances and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact