Haim Danenberg

124 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Haim Danenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Pharmaceutical Science 366
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 835
  • Biomaterials 531
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 122
  • Immunology 402
Replace Mark Slevin with:
Mark Slevin United Kingdom
Takayoshi Suganami Japan
Negar Azarpira Iran
Dong Wang United States
Seung‐Whan Kim South Korea
Julio Fernandes Canada
Rongqian Wu China
Eugénia Carvalho Portugal
Gabrielle Fredman United States
Mohammad R. Siddiqui United States
Haim Danenberg relative to Mark Slevin United Kingdom Mark Slevin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Mark Slevin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haim Danenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haim Danenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haim Danenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haim Danenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haim Danenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haim Danenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haim Danenberg. The network helps show where Haim Danenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Haim Danenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haim Danenberg Line = papers co-authored together Haim Danenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002315
2 2008243
3 2003241
4 2002211
5 1992115
6 2008112
7 2007104
8 200298
9 200389
10 201781
11 199279
12 199571
13 200865
14 200664
15 201361
16 200360
17 200859
18 199955
19 200855
20 200251

About Haim Danenberg

Haim Danenberg is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 129 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (42 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (19 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (10 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (9 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (8 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (5 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (366 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (835 citations), Biomaterials (531 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (122 citations) and Immunology (402 citations). Haim Danenberg has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gershon Golomb, Michael Chorny, Ilia Fishbein, Nickolay Koroukhov, Einat Cohen-Sela, Etty Grad, S. Lustig, Jianchuan Gao, Elazer R. Edelman and D. Ben‐Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, EuroIntervention, Journal of Controlled Release, The American Journal of Cardiology and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact