H. Scheer

748 citations
20 papers · 705 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

H. Scheer

19 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

H. Scheer
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Sensory Systems 90
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 240
  • Physiology 52
  • Reproductive Medicine 79
  • Cell Biology 124
Replace Siegried Pelzer with:
Siegried Pelzer Canada
Pedro Sánchez‐García Spain
A.K. Thompson United States
José Luis Liberona Chile
Ravindra K. Malhotra United States
Seunghoon Oh South Korea
Seong‐Woo Jeong South Korea
Dayao Zhao United States
Pedro Michelena Spain
R.A. Akhtar United States
H. Scheer relative to Siegried Pelzer Canada Siegried Pelzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.9×
Siegried Pelzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Scheer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Scheer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Scheer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Scheer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Scheer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Scheer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Scheer. The network helps show where H. Scheer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside H. Scheer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Scheer Line = papers co-authored together H. Scheer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Receptor-activated Ca2+ influx. Two independently regulated mechanisms of influx stimulation coexist in neurosecretory PC12 cells.
1992159
2 1992132
3 198080
4 198674
5 198555
6 198138
7 198629
8 198328
9 198326
10 198918
11 199016
12
Alpha latrotoxin of black widow spider venom: an interesting neurotoxin and a tool for investigating the process of neurotransmitter release.
198415
13 199112
14 199210
15 19915
16 19773
17 19922
18 19852
19 19921
20 19820

About H. Scheer

H. Scheer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cell Biology and Genetics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (3 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (3 papers), Aldose Reductase and Taurine (2 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (90 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (240 citations), Physiology (52 citations), Reproductive Medicine (79 citations) and Cell Biology (124 citations). H. Scheer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jacopo Meldolesi, Bernard Robaire, Emilio Clementi, Tullio Pozzan, Daniele Zacchetti, Cristina Fasolato, Luisa Madeddu, Enzo Wanke, Gianfranco Prestipino and Denis Lavoie. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, Pharmacological Research, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Regulatory Peptides and Biochemical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact