H S Sacks

857 citations
9 papers · 693 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

H S Sacks

9 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

H S Sacks
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Gastroenterology 183
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 81
  • Virology 49
  • Physiology 132
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace P. C Gotzsche with:
P. C Gotzsche Denmark
J. Y. Mary France
J M Bland United Kingdom
Waldemar Siemens Germany
Richard Berzon United States
Basel Abdelazeem United States
Yiqiao Xin United Kingdom
A. Neiß Germany
M C Bateson United Kingdom
James Goodhand United Kingdom
H S Sacks relative to P. C Gotzsche Denmark P. C Gotzsche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.1×
P. C Gotzsche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H S Sacks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H S Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H S Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H S Sacks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H S Sacks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H S Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H S Sacks. The network helps show where H S Sacks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside H S Sacks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H S Sacks Line = papers co-authored together H S Sacks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1990242
2 1987167
3 1984116
4
Meta-analysis: an update.
199694
5 198860
6
Effect of antiviral drugs and hematopoietic growth factors on in vitro erythropoiesis.
19985
7 19884
8
An open-label, dose-ranging trial of AL 721 in patients with persistent generalized lymphadenopathy and AIDS-related complex.
19914
9
Meta analysis of randomized control trials of nicotine chewing gum
19861

About H S Sacks

H S Sacks is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Genetics and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (2 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (1 paper), Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis (1 paper), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (183 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (81 citations), Virology (49 citations), Physiology (132 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). H S Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T C Chalmers, Dinah Reitman, Bruce Kupelnick, Edwarda Rorat, Usha Mathur‐Wagh, Ilya Spigland, Donna Mildvan, Tony Cheung, RS Weinberg and David G. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Stroke, Controlled Clinical Trials, JAMA and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact