H. Liebl

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

H. Liebl
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Structural Biology 64
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 314
  • Computational Mechanics 579
  • Radiation 203
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 190
Replace T. B. Lucatorto with:
T. B. Lucatorto United States
H. Winter Austria
E. T. Kennedy Ireland
B. H. Cooper United States
B. Sulik Hungary
M. H. Prior United States
T. J. M. Zouros Greece
H. F. Krause United States
W. L. Morgan United States
P. Roncin France
H. Liebl relative to T. B. Lucatorto United States T. B. Lucatorto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
T. B. Lucatorto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Liebl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Liebl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Liebl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Liebl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Liebl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Liebl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Liebl. The network helps show where H. Liebl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside H. Liebl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Liebl Line = papers co-authored together H. Liebl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967220
2 1981114
3 198880
4 197579
5 197567
6 196358
7 200746
8 200844
9 199740
10 197639
11 197134
12 199733
13 197533
14 199733
15 199630
16 198030
17 196227
18 195525
19 195723
20 197422

About H. Liebl

H. Liebl is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion-surface interactions and analysis (23 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (18 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (7 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (7 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (64 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (314 citations), Computational Mechanics (579 citations), Radiation (203 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (190 citations). H. Liebl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Kummer, Wolfgang Höfer, Dmitri Vassilevich, H. Engelhardt, Richard F. Herzog, D. Menzel, H. Ewald, M. Donath, M. O. Katanaev and V. Dose. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Physics B, Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Applied Physics and Vacuum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact