H. Hellwig

1.3k citations
57 papers · 568 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

H. Hellwig

51 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

H. Hellwig
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 122
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 482
  • Spectroscopy 78
  • Radiation 37
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 31
Replace T. E. Mcgunigal with:
T. E. Mcgunigal United States
R. L. Sydnor United States
G. Santarelli France
Ichiro Ushijima Japan
D.J. Healey United States
Noriaki Ohmae Japan
M. Lours France
Miho Fujieda Japan
Nate Phillips United States
Mizuhiko Hosokawa Japan
H. Hellwig relative to T. E. Mcgunigal United States T. E. Mcgunigal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
T. E. Mcgunigal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Hellwig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Hellwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Hellwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Hellwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Hellwig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Hellwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Hellwig. The network helps show where H. Hellwig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside H. Hellwig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Hellwig Line = papers co-authored together H. Hellwig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970107
2 200361
3 197629
4 197528
5 197325
6 197221
7 197719
8 197917
9 197417
10 199816
11 197714
12 197812
13 197912
14 197511
15
Time deviation and time prediction error for clock specification, characterization, and application
197810
16 197610
17 197610
18 196710
19 199010
20 19689

About H. Hellwig

H. Hellwig is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Spectroscopy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 57 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (46 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (20 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (16 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (11 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (10 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (5 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (5 papers) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (122 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (482 citations), Spectroscopy (78 citations), Radiation (37 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (31 citations). H. Hellwig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include D.W. Allan, D.J. Glaze, D. J. Wineland, P. W. Zitzewitz, R. F. C. Vessot, G. M. R. Winkler, F.L. Walls, D. Halford, J.R. Vig and J. Vanier. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Metrologia, Proceedings of the IEEE, Journal of Applied Physics and Physics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact