Nate Phillips

1.5k citations
9 papers · 1.0k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Nate Phillips

7 papers receiving 949 citations

Nate Phillips's Hit Papers

An Atomic Clock with 10 –18 Instability 2013 · 552 citations
5520+4+8Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Nate Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 968
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 83
  • Spectroscopy 60
  • Ocean Engineering 37
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 114
Replace Jeffrey A. Sherman with:
Jeffrey A. Sherman United States
Marco Pizzocaro Italy
Rees McNally United States
William F. McGrew United States
Noriaki Ohmae Japan
Robert Fasano United States
Ichiro Ushijima Japan
N. Hinkley United States
Gianmaria Milani Italy
M. Lours France
Nate Phillips relative to Jeffrey A. Sherman United States Jeffrey A. Sherman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jeffrey A. Sherman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nate Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nate Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nate Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nate Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nate Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nate Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nate Phillips. The network helps show where Nate Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nate Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nate Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Nate Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
An Atomic Clock with 10 –18 Instability
Hit paper breakdown →
2013552
2 2016235
3 201494
4 201772
5 201351
6 20241
7
An atomic clock with 10-18 instability | NIST
20131
8 20240
9 20140

About Nate Phillips

Nate Phillips is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (2 papers), Radar Systems and Signal Processing (1 paper), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (1 paper), Radio Wave Propagation Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (968 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (83 citations), Spectroscopy (60 citations), Ocean Engineering (37 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (114 citations). Nate Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include N. Hinkley, M. Schioppo, K. Beloy, Andrew D. Ludlow, C. W. Oates, Jeffrey A. Sherman, Marco Pizzocaro, N. Lemke, Gianmaria Milani and William F. McGrew. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Science, Nature Photonics and arXiv (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact