H. Enquist

20 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

H. Enquist
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Structural Biology 20
  • Radiation 37
  • Materials Chemistry 175
  • Computational Mechanics 64
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 59
Replace I. L. Shul’pina with:
I. L. Shul’pina Russia
K. Naukkarinen Finland
Ryna B. Marinenko United States
Travis D. Frazer United States
Igor Jenčič Slovenia
S. Reboh France
Maheswar Nayak India
T. Chase United States
Kathleen M. Hoogeboom-Pot United States
Igor A. Makhotkin Netherlands
H. Enquist relative to I. L. Shul’pina Russia I. L. Shul’pina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
I. L. Shul’pina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Enquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Enquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Enquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Enquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Enquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Enquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Enquist. The network helps show where H. Enquist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Enquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Enquist Line = papers co-authored together H. Enquist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201265
2 200840
3 201232
4 201626
5 201417
6 201116
7 202015
8 200712
9 201011
10 201110
11 20109
12 20089
13 20077
14 20157
15 20105
16 20164
17 20133
18 20172
19 20102
20 20181

About H. Enquist

H. Enquist is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Radiation, Materials Chemistry, Geophysics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 22 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (9 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (6 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (6 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (4 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (3 papers), Thermal properties of materials (3 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers) and Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (20 citations), Radiation (37 citations), Materials Chemistry (175 citations), Computational Mechanics (64 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (59 citations). H. Enquist has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Jörgen Larsson, Maher Harb, Clemens von Korff Schmising, P. Sondhauss, Alexander N. Obraztsov, Tue N. Hansen, Jim Larsson, Dmitry Khakhulin, Petr V. Shvets and Ivan A Maximov. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Structural Dynamics, Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact