H. Cederquist

5.3k citations
202 papers · 4.0k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

H. Cederquist

193 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

H. Cederquist
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.4k
  • Spectroscopy 1.5k
  • Radiation 493
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 647
  • Computational Mechanics 690
Replace H. T. Schmidt with:
H. T. Schmidt Sweden
D. Zajfman Israel
R. Hoekstra Netherlands
R. A. Phaneuf United States
O. Heber Israel
J. U. Andersen Denmark
S. Schippers Germany
T. Andersen Denmark
E. Salzborn Germany
H. G. Berry United States
H. Cederquist relative to H. T. Schmidt Sweden H. T. Schmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. T. Schmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Cederquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Cederquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Cederquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Cederquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Cederquist. The network helps show where H. Cederquist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Cederquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Cederquist Line = papers co-authored together H. Cederquist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985213
2 1984178
3 200181
4 200081
5 199771
6 199867
7 201066
8 200666
9 199564
10 201162
11 198361
12 200359
13 201559
14 198556
15 198956
16 200054
17 199653
18 200352
19 200251
20 200448

About H. Cederquist

H. Cederquist is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 202 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (153 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (64 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (61 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (42 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (30 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (27 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (22 papers) and X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.4k citations), Spectroscopy (1.5k citations), Radiation (493 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (647 citations) and Computational Mechanics (690 citations). H. Cederquist has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and France. Frequent co-authors include H. T. Schmidt, P. Hvelplund, Henning Zettergren, S. Mannervik, Bernd Huber, A. Bárány, G. Astner, H. Knudsen, J. Jensen and L. Liljeby. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact