H. Cederquist

5.4k citations
214 papers · 4.6k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

H. Cederquist

207 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

H. Cederquist
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.3k
  • Spectroscopy 587
  • Organic Chemistry 805
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 390
  • Computational Mechanics 357
Replace Bernd Huber with:
Bernd Huber France
Henning Zettergren Sweden
Bruno Manil France
Stefan Rosén Sweden
M. Lezius Germany
Patrick Rousseau France
T. Azuma Japan
T. Andersen Denmark
Alicja Domaracka France
Sylvain Maclot France
H. Cederquist relative to Bernd Huber France Bernd Huber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Bernd Huber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Cederquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Cederquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Cederquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Cederquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Cederquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Cederquist. The network helps show where H. Cederquist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Cederquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Cederquist Line = papers co-authored together H. Cederquist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 214 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985216
2 1984177
3 2011113
4 200189
5 200083
6 199772
7 200669
8 199868
9 201068
10 201167
11 199564
12 201564
13 201362
14 198361
15 200361
16 198556
17 199656
18 198955
19 200055
20 200354

About H. Cederquist

H. Cederquist is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Computational Mechanics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 214 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (161 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (46 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (21 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (19 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (17 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.3k citations), Spectroscopy (587 citations), Organic Chemistry (805 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (390 citations) and Computational Mechanics (357 citations). H. Cederquist has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and France. Frequent co-authors include Henning T. Schmidt, Preben Hvelplund, Henning Zettergren, S. Mannervik, Bernd Huber, A. Bárány, Jens A. D. Jensen, G. Astner, H. Knudsen and Leif Liljeby. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact