Guy Vannier

1.2k citations
43 papers · 923 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Guy Vannier

42 papers receiving 860 citations

Peers

Guy Vannier
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Insect Science 369
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 382
  • Ecology 458
  • Ecological Modeling 62
  • Developmental Biology 26
Replace Richard A. Ring with:
Richard A. Ring Canada
MaryCarol Rossiter United Kingdom
G. Ettershank Australia
Osamu Kishida Japan
Oliver Mitesser Germany
Karen L. Olmstead United States
Maartje Liefting Netherlands
Edward B. Mondor United States
Freerk Molleman United States
Ralph E. Charlton United States
Guy Vannier relative to Richard A. Ring Canada Richard A. Ring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Richard A. Ring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Vannier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Vannier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Vannier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Vannier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Vannier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Vannier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Vannier. The network helps show where Guy Vannier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Guy Vannier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Vannier Line = papers co-authored together Guy Vannier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Survival at low temperatures in insects: what is the ecological significance of the supercooling point?
2002130
2 200372
3 199871
4 199858
5 199151
6 199848
7 199938
8 200036
9 199634
10 198733
11 199033
12 200230
13 199721
14 199920
15 199820
16 197820
17 200520
18 200116
19 199616
20 197913

About Guy Vannier

Guy Vannier is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Insect Science, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (11 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (8 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (369 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (382 citations), Ecology (458 citations), Ecological Modeling (62 citations) and Developmental Biology (26 citations). Guy Vannier has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Vernon, David Renault, C Salin, Martine Perret, Jean‐François David, Fabienne Aujard, P. Tréhen, Georges Chauvin, Jean‐François Ponge and Pierre Arpin. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Zoology, Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Thermal Biology, Journal of Zoology and Biology and Fertility of Soils.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact