G.‐U. WOLF

28 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers

G.‐U. WOLF
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Catalysis 410
  • Materials Chemistry 421
  • Cancer Research 118
  • Inorganic Chemistry 110
  • Oncology 135
Replace Hankui Liu with:
Hankui Liu United States
Ye Qu China
Xiaoxue Ma China
Xupeng Yang China
Xiaolong Yin China
Ao Huang China
Wen Guo Zou China
Wenqian Li China
Mingming Wei China
Rajesh Manne India
G.‐U. WOLF relative to Hankui Liu United States Hankui Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Hankui Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.‐U. WOLF

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.‐U. WOLF's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.‐U. WOLF with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.‐U. WOLF more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.‐U. WOLF

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.‐U. WOLF. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.‐U. WOLF. The network helps show where G.‐U. WOLF may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.‐U. WOLF, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.‐U. WOLF Line = papers co-authored together G.‐U. WOLF links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Patterns of chromosomal imbalances in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.
1997234
2 2000231
3 1997159
4 199754
5 200034
6 197129
7 200229
8 199419
9 199819
10 199718
11 199718
12 199517
13 199914
14 200011
15 19828
16 19947
17 19845
18 19844
19 19904
20 20033

About G.‐U. WOLF

G.‐U. WOLF is a scholar working on Catalysis, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 28 papers that have together received 929 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (13 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (11 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (5 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (3 papers), Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (3 papers) and Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (410 citations), Materials Chemistry (421 citations), Cancer Research (118 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (110 citations) and Oncology (135 citations). G.‐U. WOLF has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Angelika Brückner, H. Kosslick, Anke Schwendel, Martin Reichel, Holger Langreck, Manfred Dietel, Andreas Martin, Dirk Müller, Bernhard Lücke and Heinz BERNDT. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Applied Catalysis A General, Journal of Catalysis, Catalysis Letters and Surface and Interface Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact