Grete Moth

37 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Grete Moth
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47
  • Emergency Medicine 205
  • General Health Professions 356
  • Family Practice 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 146
Replace Eva Lena Strandberg with:
Eva Lena Strandberg Sweden
Valerie Overton United States
Graham Worrall Canada
Annemarie Uijen Netherlands
Annie Blyth United Kingdom
Maurice Wood United States
Elizabeth Lenaghan United Kingdom
Bridie Evans United Kingdom
Laura C. Feemster United States
Hayley Prout United Kingdom
Grete Moth relative to Eva Lena Strandberg Sweden Eva Lena Strandberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Eva Lena Strandberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grete Moth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grete Moth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grete Moth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grete Moth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grete Moth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grete Moth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grete Moth. The network helps show where Grete Moth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grete Moth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grete Moth Line = papers co-authored together Grete Moth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201586
2 201183
3 201275
4 200762
5 201558
6 201250
7 200742
8 201437
9 201437
10 201331
11 201429
12 201628
13 201627
14 201725
15 201418
16 201817
17 200816
18
A feasible method to study the Danish out-of-hours primary care service.
201414
19 20139
20 20149

About Grete Moth

Grete Moth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (12 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (11 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (9 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (8 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (47 citations), Emergency Medicine (205 citations), General Health Professions (356 citations), Family Practice (27 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (146 citations). Grete Moth has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Vedsted, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers, Frede Olesen, Mogens Vestergaard, Marianne Rosendal, Anders Helles Carlsen, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Mette Trøllund Rask and Anna Budtz-Lilly. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, British Journal of General Practice, Family Practice and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact