Grete Moth

1.1k citations
38 papers · 849 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Grete Moth

37 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

Grete Moth
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 43
  • Emergency Medicine 117
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 107
  • Family Practice 12
  • General Health Professions 105
Replace Ylva Tomson with:
Ylva Tomson Sweden
Ellen Keizer Netherlands
Fitsum Sebsibe Teni Ethiopia
K. Klose Germany
Elizabeth Lenaghan United Kingdom
Thomas Bookwalter United States
Maurice Wood United States
Greg Warner United Kingdom
L Stobbart United Kingdom
Stefan Neuner‐Jehle Switzerland
Grete Moth relative to Ylva Tomson Sweden Ylva Tomson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.9×
Ylva Tomson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grete Moth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grete Moth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grete Moth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grete Moth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grete Moth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grete Moth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grete Moth. The network helps show where Grete Moth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grete Moth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grete Moth Line = papers co-authored together Grete Moth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201590
2 201184
3 201278
4 201563
5 200762
6 201251
7 200742
8 201438
9 201437
10 201333
11 201429
12 201628
13 201627
14 201725
15 201418
16 201817
17 200816
18
A feasible method to study the Danish out-of-hours primary care service.
201414
19 20139
20 20149

About Grete Moth

Grete Moth is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 citations), Emergency Medicine (117 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (107 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and General Health Professions (105 citations). Grete Moth has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Vedsted, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers, Frede Olesen, Marianne Rosendal, Mogens Vestergaard, Anders Helles Carlsen, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Mette Trøllund Rask and Per Fink. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, British Journal of General Practice, Acta Paediatrica and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact