Greg Walker
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Arthur Joseph Slavin (1 shared paper)Thomas F. Mayer (1 shared paper)Vincent Gillespie (1 shared paper)Peter J. Smith (1 shared paper)LLOYD E. DAVIS (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- History of European Ideas (8 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Greg Walker
24 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Classics 209
- History 242
- Literature and Literary Theory 71
- Anthropology 55
- Religious studies 27
Countries citing papers authored by Greg Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Walker. The network helps show where Greg Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Greg Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 86 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 8 | Imagining Spectatorship: From the Mysteries to the Shakespearean Stage | 2016 | 13 |
| 9 | 1989 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 17 | The Popular Voice in Sir David Lyndsay's Satire of the Thrie Estaitis | 2014 | 2 |
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 19 | Reflections on Staging Sir David Lyndsay's Satire of the Three Estates at Linlithgow Palace, June 2013 | 2013 | 1 |
| 20 | Reading Literature Historically: Drama and Poetry from Chaucer to the Reformation | 2013 | 1 |
About Greg Walker
Greg Walker is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics and Music, having authored 43 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (16 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (12 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (209 citations), History (242 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Anthropology (55 citations) and Religious studies (27 citations). Greg Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Joseph Slavin, Thomas F. Mayer, Vincent Gillespie, Peter J. Smith and LLOYD E. DAVIS. Their work appears in journals such as History of European Ideas, The American Historical Review, Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual, The Modern Language Review and The Historical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.