Greg W. Ebert
Impact in
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 4
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 4
- Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 2
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics 2
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 1
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 2
- Co-authors
- Reuben D. Rieke (3 shared papers)Richard M. Wehmeyer (1 shared paper)Liming Dong (2 shared papers)Bing Ma (1 shared paper)Charles A. Kingsbury (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (6 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Organometallics (1 paper)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Synthetic Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Greg W. Ebert
12 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Process Chemistry and Technology 56
- Organic Chemistry 284
- Inorganic Chemistry 85
- Pharmaceutical Science 26
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 40
Countries citing papers authored by Greg W. Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg W. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg W. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg W. Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg W. Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg W. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg W. Ebert. The network helps show where Greg W. Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Greg W. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 70 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 |
About Greg W. Ebert
Greg W. Ebert is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Catalysis and Insect Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (4 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (2 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (56 citations), Organic Chemistry (284 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (85 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (40 citations). Greg W. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Reuben D. Rieke, Richard M. Wehmeyer, Liming Dong, Bing Ma and Charles A. Kingsbury. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron, Organometallics, Tetrahedron Letters and Synthetic Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.