Greg W. Ebert
Impact in
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 5
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 4
- Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 2
- Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 2
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 2
-
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry 3
- Co-authors
- Reuben D. Rieke (4 shared papers)Richard M. Wehmeyer (1 shared paper)Liming Dong (2 shared papers)Bing Ma (1 shared paper)Charles A. Kingsbury (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (6 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Organometallics (1 paper)Synthetic Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Greg W. Ebert
12 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Process Chemistry and Technology 51
- Organic Chemistry 265
- Inorganic Chemistry 77
- Pharmaceutical Science 24
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 34
Countries citing papers authored by Greg W. Ebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Greg W. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg W. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg W. Ebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Greg W. Ebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg W. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg W. Ebert. The network helps show where Greg W. Ebert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Greg W. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 61 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 57 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1 |
About Greg W. Ebert
Greg W. Ebert is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Inorganic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (5 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (2 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (51 citations), Organic Chemistry (265 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (77 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (24 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (34 citations). Greg W. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Reuben D. Rieke, Richard M. Wehmeyer, Liming Dong, Bing Ma and Charles A. Kingsbury. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron, Organometallics and Synthetic Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.