Grace E. Dean

2.8k citations
59 papers · 2.1k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Grace E. Dean

59 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Grace E. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Occupational Therapy 190
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 474
  • Oncology 705
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 107
  • Research and Theory 16
Replace Debra Lyon with:
Debra Lyon United States
Mats Hammar Sweden
Yvonne Michel United States
Joanna Rosińćzuk Poland
Andrew G. Bushmakin United States
Jean Jobin Canada
Hui‐Ling Lai Taiwan
Sheri Fehnel United States
Jacob N. Ablin Israel
Martin Mücke Germany
Grace E. Dean relative to Debra Lyon United States Debra Lyon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Debra Lyon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace E. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace E. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace E. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace E. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace E. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace E. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace E. Dean. The network helps show where Grace E. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace E. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace E. Dean Line = papers co-authored together Grace E. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011237
2 2007179
3 2006151
4 1990145
5 2010138
6 2004132
7 198291
8 200778
9 198070
10 199568
11 201454
12 200852
13
Fatigue in patients with cancer receiving interferon alpha.
199552
14 199550
15 198250
16 201349
17 199439
18 201438
19 201833
20 199730

About Grace E. Dean

Grace E. Dean is a scholar working on Oncology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (16 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (16 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (6 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (190 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (474 citations), Oncology (705 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (107 citations) and Research and Theory (16 citations). Grace E. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Betty Ferrell, Ann E. Rogers, Marcia Grant, Mary G. Carey, Deborah S. Finnell, Salah S. Al‐Zaiti, Loralee Sessanna, David Chu, Robert S. Krouse and Emanuel J. Diliberto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Nursing, Oncology nursing forum, Behavioral Sleep Medicine and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact