G.M. Thomas

16 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

G.M. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Reproductive Medicine 120
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 34
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Oncology 69
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 60
Replace Theodore Chambers with:
Theodore Chambers United States
Deming He China
Tanya Ellis Australia
Aditya Sharma India
Jonathan Boone United States
Candice W. Bolan United States
Antonio Notaristefano Italy
Nilesh Sable India
Soleen Ghafoor Switzerland
P Szépe Slovakia
G.M. Thomas relative to Theodore Chambers United States Theodore Chambers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Theodore Chambers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.M. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.M. Thomas. The network helps show where G.M. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.M. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.M. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together G.M. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199264
2 198861
3 200047
4 198135
5 198430
6 198028
7
A Client-Server Approach to Image-Based Rendering on Mobile Terminals
200526
8 198523
9 200616
10 198210
11 19845
12 20012
13 19812
14 19782
15 19821
16 19841
17
Client-Server Visualization of City Models through Non Photorealistic Rendering
20051

About G.M. Thomas

G.M. Thomas is a scholar working on Surgery, Reproductive Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 17 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (2 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (120 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (34 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), Oncology (69 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (60 citations). G.M. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include A.J. Dembo, Stéphane Donikian, Neville F. Hacker, A.D. DePetrillo, B. Cummings, Andrew R. Harwood, W.D. Rider, J. F. Pringle, Jeremy Sturgeon and Thomas J. Keane. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Gynecologic Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact