Giulia Negro

504 citations
8 papers · 133 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Giulia Negro

8 papers receiving 131 citations

Peers

Giulia Negro
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 32
  • Cancer Research 22
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 33
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 20
  • Molecular Biology 75
Replace João Carlos Ribeiro-Silva with:
João Carlos Ribeiro-Silva Brazil
Kirill Batmanov United States
Sami Alkayyali Sweden
Pankaj Shende Switzerland
Madalina Duta-Mare Austria
Eva Röder Switzerland
Liang Chang China
Luan T. Tran Canada
Patricia R. Schrank United States
Joseph W. Fowler United States
Giulia Negro relative to João Carlos Ribeiro-Silva Brazil João Carlos Ribeiro-Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
João Carlos Ribeiro-Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Negro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Negro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Negro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Negro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Negro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Negro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Negro. The network helps show where Giulia Negro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Negro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Negro Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Negro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201734
2 201527
3 201818
4 201714
5 202012
6 202111
7 202310
8 20207

About Giulia Negro

Giulia Negro is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cancer Research, having authored 8 papers that have together received 133 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (1 paper), RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (32 citations), Cancer Research (22 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (33 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (20 citations) and Molecular Biology (75 citations). Giulia Negro has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Pinggera, Jörg Striessnig, Andreas Lieb, Petronel Tuluc, Morris J. Brown, Eriola Hoxha, Tahani K. Alshammari, Filippo Tempia, Musaad A. Alshammari and Fernanda Laezza. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Cells, Channels and Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact