Gina Deck
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Epilepsy research and treatment
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 3
- Neurological Complications and Syndromes 1
-
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 1
- Co-authors
- Andrew J. Cole (2 shared papers)Alica M. Goldman (1 shared paper)Jeffrey L. Noebels (1 shared paper)Alice Lam (1 shared paper)Emad N. Eskandar (1 shared paper)Eric S. Rosenthal (1 shared paper)Aaron F. Struck (1 shared paper)M. Brandon Westover (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurocritical Care (1 paper)Epilepsy & Behavior (1 paper)Nature Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper)Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Gina Deck
7 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Psychiatry and Mental health 165
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 146
- Cognitive Neuroscience 104
- Physiology 117
- Neurology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Gina Deck
This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Deck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Deck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Deck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Deck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Deck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Deck. The network helps show where Gina Deck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Gina Deck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 264 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | Fighting Fire with Fire: Surgical Options for Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. | 2018 | 3 |
About Gina Deck
Gina Deck is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper), Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment (1 paper), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (165 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (146 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (104 citations), Physiology (117 citations) and Neurology (33 citations). Gina Deck has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Cole, Alica M. Goldman, Jeffrey L. Noebels, Alice Lam, Emad N. Eskandar, Eric S. Rosenthal, Aaron F. Struck, M. Brandon Westover, Lance T. Hall and Benjamin D. Philpot. Their work appears in journals such as Neurocritical Care, Epilepsy & Behavior, Nature Medicine, Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.