Gilmar Conte

666 citations
22 papers · 610 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Gilmar Conte

22 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Gilmar Conte
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 306
  • Organic Chemistry 306
  • Materials Chemistry 282
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 41
  • Inorganic Chemistry 58
Replace Monica Iliş with:
Monica Iliş Romania
Germain Puccetti United States
Georgia A. Zissimou Cyprus
Vladislav M. Korshunov Russia
Marta S. C. Henriques Portugal
Alžbeta Krutošı́ková Slovakia
Yoshiharu Toriumi Japan
Emma Cavero Spain
Khalid Al-Farhan Saudi Arabia
Dileep A. K. Vezzu United States
Gilmar Conte relative to Monica Iliş Romania Monica Iliş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Monica Iliş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilmar Conte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilmar Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilmar Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilmar Conte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilmar Conte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilmar Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilmar Conte. The network helps show where Gilmar Conte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gilmar Conte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilmar Conte Line = papers co-authored together Gilmar Conte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201272
2 200561
3 200854
4 200744
5 200842
6 200639
7 201138
8 200537
9 200929
10 201329
11 200627
12 201027
13 201026
14 201022
15 200419
16 200614
17 20118
18 20197
19 20127
20 20185

About Gilmar Conte

Gilmar Conte is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (7 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (6 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (4 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (4 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (306 citations), Organic Chemistry (306 citations), Materials Chemistry (282 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (41 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (58 citations). Gilmar Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Spain and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Gallardo, Adaı́lton J. Bortoluzzi, Fernando Ely, Ivan H. Bechtold, Juliana Eccher, Rodrigo Cristiano, André Alexandre Vieira, Ademir Neves, M. Cremona and Welber G. Quirino. Their work appears in journals such as Liquid Crystals, Synthesis, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact