Gill Scott

1.5k citations
45 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Nephrology top 5%
    • Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Neurology top 10%
    • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Papers in

Gill Scott

43 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Gill Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Nephrology 105
  • Neurology 116
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 171
  • Physiology 45
  • Biophysics 49
Replace Stephen A. Douglas with:
Stephen A. Douglas United States
Michael P. O’Connor United States
Maria Wendt Germany
Donna L. Smith United States
Claudia Großmann Germany
Peter Rhodes United Kingdom
Laura Sciacca Italy
Kimberly A. Fernandes Canada
Hugo P. Monteiro Brazil
Gill Scott relative to Stephen A. Douglas United States Stephen A. Douglas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Stephen A. Douglas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Scott. The network helps show where Gill Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gill Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gill Scott Line = papers co-authored together Gill Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000332
2 1998183
3 199976
4 200174
5 200653
6 200148
7
The media, poverty and public opinion in the UK
200829
8 200422
9 200921
10 200721
11 200019
12 199619
13 201218
14 201418
15 200618
16 201516
17 199813
18 200812
19 201612
20
Poverty in Scotland 2014: The Independence Referendum and Beyond
201411

About Gill Scott

Gill Scott is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Education, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Education Systems and Policy (7 papers), Rural development and sustainability (6 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (6 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (105 citations), Neurology (116 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (171 citations), Physiology (45 citations) and Biophysics (49 citations). Gill Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include D. Craig Hooper, Rhonda Kean, Gerry Mooney, Hilary Koprowski, Anna Zborek, Sergei Spitsin, Tatiana Mikheeva, László Virág, Csaba Szabó and Daniel J. Marmer. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Social Policy, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Journal of Neuroimmunology, The FASEB Journal and Management in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact