Giles Innocent
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Helminth infection and control
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Equine top 1%
Papers in
-
- Helminth infection and control 24
-
- Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology 12
- Co-authors
- S. W. J. Reid (21 shared papers)G. Gettinby (3 shared papers)Nils Toft (4 shared papers)W. McLean (3 shared papers)Dai Grove‐White (4 shared papers)Kathryn Ellis (3 shared papers)M. Mihm (4 shared papers)C. V. Howard (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Preventive Veterinary Medicine (8 papers)Veterinary Record (5 papers)Epidemiology and Infection (4 papers)Veterinary Parasitology (4 papers)Frontiers in Veterinary Science (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomEthiopiaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Giles Innocent
70 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Small Animals 510
- Equine 95
- Parasitology 249
- Agronomy and Crop Science 352
- Animal Science and Zoology 302
Countries citing papers authored by Giles Innocent
This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Innocent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Innocent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Innocent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Innocent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Innocent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Innocent. The network helps show where Giles Innocent may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giles Innocent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 181 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 134 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 28 |
About Giles Innocent
Giles Innocent is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology and Food Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helminth infection and control (24 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (12 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (9 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (9 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers) and Escherichia coli research studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (510 citations), Equine (95 citations), Parasitology (249 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (352 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (302 citations). Giles Innocent has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ethiopia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include S. W. J. Reid, G. Gettinby, Nils Toft, W. McLean, Dai Grove‐White, Kathryn Ellis, M. Mihm, C. V. Howard, Peter J. Cripps and M.J. Stear. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Record, Epidemiology and Infection, Veterinary Parasitology and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.