This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Viator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Viator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Viator more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Viator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Viator.
About Viator
The 887 papers published in Viator in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Viator usually cover Classics (508 papers), History (475 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (55 papers), Archeology (118 papers) and Religious studies (47 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (383 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (134 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (121 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (119 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (79 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (75 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (73 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Viator are Paul Saenger, Elizabeth A. R. Brown, Felice Lifshitz, Martin Kemp, Edward Grant, John M. Riddle, John T. Noonan, Henry Ansgar Kelly, Amos Funkenstein and Richard C. Dales.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.