Daniel R. Woolf
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Chris Given-Wilson (1 shared paper)Patricia A. Crawford (1 shared paper)Sara Mendelson (1 shared paper)Paul Slack (2 shared papers)John Morrill (2 shared papers)Norm L. Jones (1 shared paper)Masayuki Satō (1 shared paper)José Rabasa (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (5 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of History (2 papers)Huntington Library Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Daniel R. Woolf
39 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Classics 207
- History 331
- Literature and Literary Theory 111
- Religious studies 35
- Philosophy 61
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Woolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Woolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Woolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Woolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Woolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Woolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Woolf. The network helps show where Daniel R. Woolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Woolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 97 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1969 | 51 | |
| 5 | The idea of history in early Stuart England | 1990 | 39 |
| 6 | 1993 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 9 | A Global History of History | 2011 | 24 |
| 10 | 1988 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 12 | The Oxford history of historical writing vol 3 1400 - 1800 | 2012 | 18 |
| 13 | 1988 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 19 | Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England Essays Presented to G.E. Aylmer | 1993 | 11 |
| 20 | 1995 | 11 |
About Daniel R. Woolf
Daniel R. Woolf is a scholar working on History, Classics, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Religious studies, having authored 55 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, History, and Historiography (24 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (15 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (9 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (5 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (207 citations), History (331 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Religious studies (35 citations) and Philosophy (61 citations). Daniel R. Woolf has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Chris Given-Wilson, Patricia A. Crawford, Sara Mendelson, Paul Slack, John Morrill, Norm L. Jones, Masayuki Satō, José Rabasa, Ian Hesketh and Gerald E. Aylmer. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, The English Historical Review, Journal of History and Huntington Library Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.