Gilbert Weinstein

1.1k citations
52 papers · 662 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Gilbert Weinstein

50 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers

Gilbert Weinstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 231
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 245
  • Applied Mathematics 155
  • Mathematical Physics 111
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 76
Replace J. A. Brooke with:
J. A. Brooke Canada
Hideki Omori Japan
Ning Su United States
Roberto Soldati Italy
S. TERASHIMA Japan
Alok Kumar India
Alfred Rieckers Germany
Jørgen Ellegaard Andersen Denmark
K. Okano Japan
Robie A. Hennigar Canada
Gilbert Weinstein relative to J. A. Brooke Canada J. A. Brooke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
J. A. Brooke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert Weinstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert Weinstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert Weinstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert Weinstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gilbert Weinstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert Weinstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert Weinstein. The network helps show where Gilbert Weinstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gilbert Weinstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gilbert Weinstein Line = papers co-authored together Gilbert Weinstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200683
2 199063
3 197048
4 197348
5 200834
6 197331
7 196726
8 199223
9 199422
10 200022
11 200022
12 199518
13 200416
14 200015
15 200014
16 201314
17 201714
18 199612
19 200011
20 200910

About Gilbert Weinstein

Gilbert Weinstein is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Applied Mathematics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (12 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (11 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (9 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (7 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (5 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (231 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (245 citations), Applied Mathematics (155 citations), Mathematical Physics (111 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (76 citations). Gilbert Weinstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Rudi Weikard, R. H. Holm, S. C. Tang, M. J. O'CONNOR, R. H. Holm, Sumio Yamada, Marcus Khuri, Yanyan Li, Piotr T. Chruściel and R. W. Lane. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Inorganic Chemistry, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Research Letters and Duke Mathematical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact