Gesa Busch

48 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Gesa Busch
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Small Animals 197
  • Business and International Management 21
  • Animal Science and Zoology 72
  • Ecology 165
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 10
Replace Carolien de Lauwere with:
Carolien de Lauwere Netherlands
Courtney Bir United States
Marija Klopčić Slovenia
Sarah Kühl Germany
Marie von Meyer-Höfer Germany
Heinke Heise Germany
Jorgelina Di Pasquale Italy
Wílmer S. Sepúlveda Spain
Anna Gaviglio Italy
P. Nicholas United Kingdom
Gesa Busch relative to Carolien de Lauwere Netherlands Carolien de Lauwere's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Carolien de Lauwere · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gesa Busch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gesa Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gesa Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesa Busch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gesa Busch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gesa Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gesa Busch. The network helps show where Gesa Busch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Gesa Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gesa Busch Line = papers co-authored together Gesa Busch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017108
2 202061
3 202146
4 201640
5 201438
6 202121
7 201819
8 201917
9 202316
10 202215
11 201815
12 201814
13 202013
14 202111
15 202410
16 202110
17 202010
18 20239
19 20239
20 20228

About Gesa Busch

Gesa Busch is a scholar working on Small Animals, Ecology, Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Food Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (18 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (15 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (9 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (7 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (5 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (4 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (197 citations), Business and International Management (21 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (72 citations), Ecology (165 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (10 citations). Gesa Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Achim Spiller, Daniel M. Weary, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, Antje Risius, Marco A. Palma, Bachir Kassas, Sarah Kühl, Ramona Weinrich, Matthias Gauly and B. Schulze. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, British Food Journal, Animal Frontiers, animal and Livestock Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact