Gerold Holzer

2.6k citations
64 papers · 1.8k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Gerold Holzer

59 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Gerold Holzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 552
  • Surgery 506
  • Oncology 278
  • Rheumatology 110
  • Rehabilitation 35
Replace Philippe Wicart with:
Philippe Wicart France
Loredana Cavalli Italy
Hiromichi Norimatsu Japan
Vito Pavone Italy
Juha Paloneva Finland
Alan J. Hakim United Kingdom
Elizabeth M. Winter Netherlands
Masahito Hatori Japan
S Gnudi Italy
John Henley United States
Gerold Holzer relative to Philippe Wicart France Philippe Wicart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Philippe Wicart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerold Holzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerold Holzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerold Holzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerold Holzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerold Holzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerold Holzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerold Holzer. The network helps show where Gerold Holzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gerold Holzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerold Holzer Line = papers co-authored together Gerold Holzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011282
2 2008267
3 1999123
4 2014108
5 202183
6 200375
7 200156
8 201955
9 201355
10 199753
11 200645
12 200543
13 195942
14 200041
15 199738
16 199537
17 199235
18 200029
19 200228
20 202026

About Gerold Holzer

Gerold Holzer is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Rheumatology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (16 papers), Bone health and treatments (9 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (5 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (4 papers), Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments (4 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (552 citations), Surgery (506 citations), Oncology (278 citations), Rheumatology (110 citations) and Rehabilitation (35 citations). Gerold Holzer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lukas A. Holzer, P. Peichl, Richard Maier, Gobert von Skrbensky, R. Kotz, W. Pichl, Reinhard Windhager, Thomas A. Einhorn, Robert J. Majeska and James R. Hartke. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Maturitas, Acta Orthopaedica, Archives of Osteoporosis and Osteoporosis International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact