Gerhard Adler

1.4k citations
19 papers · 330 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Gerhard Adler

14 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Gerhard Adler
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Psychology 22
  • Philosophy 83
  • Social Psychology 137
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Health 22
Replace D. Ray Freebury with:
D. Ray Freebury Canada
Harry Guntrip United Kingdom
Neville Symington United States
Martin S. Bergmann United States
Ludwig Binswanger
Paul Wienpahl United States
Daisetsu Teitaro Suzuki United States
Sally Swartz South Africa
Kerry Kelly Novick United States
Magnus Lakovics United States
Gerhard Adler relative to D. Ray Freebury Canada D. Ray Freebury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
D. Ray Freebury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard Adler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard Adler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard Adler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard Adler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard Adler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard Adler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard Adler. The network helps show where Gerhard Adler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Gerhard Adler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gerhard Adler Line = papers co-authored together Gerhard Adler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1959120
2 2014109
3 201455
4 201410
5 201410
6 20158
7
The Spirit in Man, Art and Literature
19713
8 20133
9 20142
10 20142
11
Revolutionäres Lateinamerika : eine Dokumentation
19701
12 19591
13
Der Bedarf an Informationswissenschaftlern und Dokumentaren
19781
14 20141
15 20141
16 19751
17 20131
18 19631
19 19750

About Gerhard Adler

Gerhard Adler is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Museology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Jungian Analytical Psychology (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (1 paper), International Relations in Latin America (1 paper) and Libraries and Information Services (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (22 citations), Philosophy (83 citations), Social Psychology (137 citations), Clinical Psychology (114 citations) and Health (22 citations). Gerhard Adler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Fordham, Carl Gustav Jung, R. F. C. Hull, C. G. Jung and Urs Schoepflin. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Journal of Analytical Psychology, The Hudson Review, Psychological Perspectives and Max Planck Digital Library.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact