Ger Ernsting

1.1k citations
38 papers · 1.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Ger Ernsting

38 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

Ger Ernsting
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 499
  • Insect Science 241
  • Ecology 470
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 166
  • Ecological Modeling 47
Replace G. Ettershank with:
G. Ettershank Australia
William S. Gaud United States
Christopher J. Hill Australia
John B. Gentry United States
Cynthia C. Bennington United States
Roswitha B. Ehnes Germany
Walter J. Diehl United States
Edward B. Mondor United States
A. T. Strathdee United Kingdom
Duncan A. Mackay Australia
Ger Ernsting relative to G. Ettershank Australia G. Ettershank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
G. Ettershank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ger Ernsting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ger Ernsting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ger Ernsting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ger Ernsting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ger Ernsting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ger Ernsting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ger Ernsting. The network helps show where Ger Ernsting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ger Ernsting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ger Ernsting Line = papers co-authored together Ger Ernsting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199288
2 199782
3 200073
4 201073
5 199260
6 199553
7 199645
8 199343
9 200340
10 199137
11 199937
12 197437
13 198834
14 199333
15 198424
16 200224
17 198823
18 200423
19 197823
20 197720

About Ger Ernsting

Ger Ernsting is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (5 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (499 citations), Insect Science (241 citations), Ecology (470 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (166 citations) and Ecological Modeling (47 citations). Ger Ernsting has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Isaaks, William Block, Nico M. van Straalen, G.W. Korthals, Matty P. Berg, Els N. G. Joosse, Bert van der Werf, A.W.G. van der Wurff, Rieta Gols and Robbert van Treuren. Their work appears in journals such as Oecologia, Ecological Entomology, Pedobiologia, Polar Biology and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact