George E. Williams

7.9k citations
175 papers · 6.4k · h-index 45

Impact in

Papers in

George E. Williams

171 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

George E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Paleontology 2.0k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 1.0k
  • Atmospheric Science 2.6k
  • Geophysics 1.6k
  • Geology 490
Replace William W. Hay with:
William W. Hay United States
Kentaro Nakamura Japan
Samuel M. Savin United States
Miriam Katz Israel
William D. Carlson United States
Henry P. Schwarcz Canada
A. Steele United States
Robert D. Ballard United States
Thomas F. Anderson United States
Michael R. Rosen United States
George E. Williams relative to William W. Hay United States William W. Hay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
William W. Hay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Williams. The network helps show where George E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together George E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 175 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972288
2 2000255
3 1971227
4 1978168
5 1975167
6 1995165
7 1956154
8 1979140
9 1989138
10 2020128
11 1993116
12 2012108
13 1986106
14 1979104
15 198193
16 197187
17 202185
18 200884
19 199181
20 199775

About George E. Williams

George E. Williams is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Geophysics, Molecular Biology and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 175 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (80 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (48 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (35 papers), Geological formations and processes (28 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (21 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (20 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (11 papers) and Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (2.0k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (1.0k citations), Atmospheric Science (2.6k citations), Geophysics (1.6k citations) and Geology (490 citations). George E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. W. Schmidt, V. A. Gostin, David S. Jackson, B. J. J. Embleton, K Bloor, Henry Polach, David M. McKirdy, H. Gregory, J B Elder and W Lawler. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, Nature, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Precambrian Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact