George E. Williams

7.9k citations
168 papers · 5.7k · h-index 44

Impact in

Papers in

George E. Williams

165 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

George E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Paleontology 1.8k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 940
  • Atmospheric Science 2.2k
  • Geophysics 1.3k
  • Geology 446
Replace Kentaro Nakamura with:
Kentaro Nakamura Japan
William W. Hay United States
Miriam Katz Israel
Samuel M. Savin United States
Henry P. Schwarcz Canada
William D. Carlson United States
Robert D. Ballard United States
A. L. Bloom United Kingdom
Michael R. Rosen United States
Michaele Kashgarian United States
George E. Williams relative to Kentaro Nakamura Japan Kentaro Nakamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Kentaro Nakamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Williams. The network helps show where George E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together George E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972267
2 2000226
3 1971211
4 1978160
5 1956154
6 1995150
7 1975139
8 2020123
9 1979123
10 1989114
11 197997
12 199397
13 201295
14 198691
15 202185
16 200883
17 197178
18 199176
19 198171
20
Alight and electron optical study of regenerating tendon.
196167

About George E. Williams

George E. Williams is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Geophysics, Molecular Biology and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 168 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (74 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (44 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (32 papers), Geological formations and processes (26 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (21 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (19 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (11 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (1.8k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (940 citations), Atmospheric Science (2.2k citations), Geophysics (1.3k citations) and Geology (446 citations). George E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. W. Schmidt, V. A. Gostin, David S. Jackson, B. J. J. Embleton, K Bloor, David M. McKirdy, H. Gregory, J B Elder, Henry Polach and W Lawler. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, Nature, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Precambrian Research and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact