George E. Schatz

97 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

George E. Schatz
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Ecological Modeling 448
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.7k
  • Forestry 323
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 816
  • Horticulture 28
Replace Porter P. Lowry with:
Porter P. Lowry United States
Paul Smith United Kingdom
David J. Harris United Kingdom
Edgar C. Turner United Kingdom
Steven P. Bachman United Kingdom
Rosane Garcia Collevatti Brazil
Andrew Henderson United States
Eliana Cazetta Brazil
Víctor Rico‐Gray Mexico
F. White United Kingdom
George E. Schatz relative to Porter P. Lowry United States Porter P. Lowry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Porter P. Lowry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Schatz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Schatz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Schatz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Schatz. The network helps show where George E. Schatz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George E. Schatz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Schatz Line = papers co-authored together George E. Schatz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001266
2 1986189
3
Atlas of the Vegetation of Madagascar
2007183
4 2017155
5 2002139
6 1981137
7 2008119
8 2019101
9 201197
10 200797
11 200190
12 201985
13 200577
14 200274
15 200569
16 200663
17 199458
18
Malagasy/Indo-Australo-Malesian phytogeographic connections
199653
19 200945
20 200040

About George E. Schatz

George E. Schatz is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Forestry, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (65 papers), Plant and animal studies (55 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (38 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (29 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (9 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (9 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (448 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.7k citations), Forestry (323 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (816 citations) and Horticulture (28 citations). George E. Schatz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Porter P. Lowry, Simone Sommer, Jörg U. Ganzhorn, Christine A. Ribic, Robert W. Sterner, Martin W. Callmander, Steven N. Handel, Sylvie Andriambololonera, David Rabehevitra and Roy E. Gereau. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Oryx, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Plant Systematics and Evolution and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact