Tom Reader

53 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Tom Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Ecological Modeling 253
  • Developmental Biology 69
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 544
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
  • Insect Science 198
Replace Eduardo S. A. Santos with:
Eduardo S. A. Santos Brazil
Isabella Capellini United Kingdom
Martin A. Stoffel United Kingdom
Nicola M. Anthony United States
Björn Rogell Sweden
Roi Dor Israel
Arild Husby Sweden
Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar Germany
Freerk Molleman United States
Sean M. Ehlman United States
Tom Reader relative to Eduardo S. A. Santos Brazil Eduardo S. A. Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Eduardo S. A. Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Reader. The network helps show where Tom Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Reader Line = papers co-authored together Tom Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019110
2 201478
3 200374
4 200968
5 200667
6 201365
7 199961
8 200859
9 200756
10 200850
11 201644
12 201043
13 202042
14 200841
15 202036
16 202036
17 200535
18 200927
19 201924
20 201324

About Tom Reader

Tom Reader is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Genetics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (14 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (253 citations), Developmental Biology (69 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (544 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (216 citations) and Insect Science (198 citations). Tom Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis Gilbert, Andrew D. Higginson, Alan G. McElligott, Dieter F. Hochuli, Mónica Padilla de la Torre, Elodie F. Briefer, Samy Zalat, Chris Barnard, Tim Newbold and Ahmed El‐Gabbas. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Ecology, Oikos, Bioelectromagnetics, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Biodiversity and Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact