George E. Briggs

3.9k citations
72 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

George E. Briggs

72 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

George E. Briggs
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 483
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 217
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 209
  • Social Psychology 301
  • Applied Psychology 63
Replace Percy D. Peckham with:
Percy D. Peckham United States
John Podd New Zealand
John Gaito Canada
Robert E. Morin United States
Alan Richardson United Kingdom
Gösta Ekman Sweden
Michael J. Wenger United States
Paul Thomas Young United States
Howard G. Schutz United States
D. Chris Anderson United States
George E. Briggs relative to Percy D. Peckham United States Percy D. Peckham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Percy D. Peckham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Briggs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Briggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Briggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Briggs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Briggs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Briggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Briggs. The network helps show where George E. Briggs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside George E. Briggs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George E. Briggs Line = papers co-authored together George E. Briggs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962171
2 1963158
3 1957141
4 195499
5 196977
6 195764
7 196960
8 197048
9 197345
10 195841
11 196239
12 195737
13 195736
14 195235
15 197233
16 196130
17 196529
18 197324
19 197224
20 195823

About George E. Briggs

George E. Briggs is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (4 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (3 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (483 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (217 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (209 citations), Social Psychology (301 citations) and Applied Psychology (63 citations). George E. Briggs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Naylor, James M. Swanson, A. B. Hope, R. N. Robertson, John Blaha, Paul M. Fitts, Harry P. Bahrick, William Johnston, C. P. Whittingham and M. G. Pitman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, New Phytologist, Journal of Experimental Botany, Nature and Memory & Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact