George Baum

32 papers receiving 866 citations

Peers

George Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Speech and Hearing 78
  • Oncology 307
  • Otorhinolaryngology 31
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Anne Coscarelli with:
Anne Coscarelli United States
Irene Teo Singapore
Jessica Roydhouse Australia
Mark R. Katz Canada
Femke Jansen Netherlands
Kathrin Milbury United States
F.S.A.M. van Dam Netherlands
Laura K. Hart United States
Marci L. Nilsen United States
Lynn Dunwoody United Kingdom
George Baum relative to Anne Coscarelli United States Anne Coscarelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Anne Coscarelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Baum. The network helps show where George Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Baum Line = papers co-authored together George Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013104
2 2001104
3 201493
4 201583
5 201180
6 201354
7 200948
8 201146
9 201744
10 201737
11 201735
12 201934
13 201525
14 201720
15 202117
16 201415
17 201014
18 201611
19 201510
20 20128

About George Baum

George Baum is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions, Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (14 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (78 citations), Oncology (307 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (31 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). George Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Basen‐Engquist, Leslie R. Schover, Abenaa M. Brewster, Cindy L. Carmack, Amal Melhem‐Bertrandt, Betty Skipper, Elizabeth Smith, William C. Hunt, Iyiin Chang and Ying Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Health Psychology, Cancer and Gynecologic Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact