Geoff Pearson

2.0k citations
66 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Geoff Pearson

61 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Geoff Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Gender Studies 399
  • Infectious Diseases 324
  • Sociology and Political Science 712
  • Political Science and International Relations 287
  • Health 69
Replace Mark Padilla with:
Mark Padilla United States
Suzanne Leclerc‐Madlala South Africa
Warwick Anderson Australia
Randy Shilts
Niamh Stephenson Australia
Claire Cameron United Kingdom
Christopher Weber United States
David J. Pivar United States
Cindy Patton Canada
Louise Shelley United States
Geoff Pearson relative to Mark Padilla United States Mark Padilla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Mark Padilla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff Pearson. The network helps show where Geoff Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geoff Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoff Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Geoff Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012109
2 2011103
3 201596
4 201588
5
Football ''Hooliganism'', Policing and the War on the ''English Disease''
200783
6 200763
7 201160
8 201460
9 201754
10 200644
11 201440
12 201736
13 201135
14 200833
15 197832
16 201030
17 200727
18 200626
19 201822
20 202222

About Geoff Pearson

Geoff Pearson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (28 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (17 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (16 papers), Doping in Sports (12 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (399 citations), Infectious Diseases (324 citations), Sociology and Political Science (712 citations), Political Science and International Relations (287 citations) and Health (69 citations). Geoff Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Clifford Stott, Mike Rowe, Emma Rayner, James Hoggett, Stuart Dowall, Roger Hewson, Frank Worthington, Mark James, Miles W. Carroll and Victoria Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Veterinary Record, Journal of General Virology, Ethnography and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact