Christopher Weber

40 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Christopher Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Communication 194
  • Sociology and Political Science 674
  • Gender Studies 132
  • Political Science and International Relations 324
  • Social Psychology 268
Replace Peter M. Aronow with:
Peter M. Aronow United States
Gordon Gauchat United States
Joanne Hughes United Kingdom
Sharon Wolf United States
Eva G. T. Green Switzerland
Ian Brunton‐Smith United Kingdom
Silvia Russo Italy
Robert Blair United States
David L. Weakliem United States
Jojanneke van der Toorn Netherlands
Christopher Weber relative to Peter M. Aronow United States Peter M. Aronow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Peter M. Aronow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Weber. The network helps show where Christopher Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Weber Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012141
2 2013125
3 2007120
4 2014100
5 201296
6 200793
7 201464
8 201157
9 201356
10 201250
11 200946
12 201742
13 201337
14 201734
15 201026
16 201625
17 201425
18 201325
19 201122
20 201215

About Christopher Weber

Christopher Weber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Communication and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (194 citations), Sociology and Political Science (674 citations), Gender Studies (132 citations), Political Science and International Relations (324 citations) and Social Psychology (268 citations). Christopher Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher M. Federico, Leonie Huddy, Stanley Feldman, Barbara S. Schnierle, Johanna Dunaway, Damla Ergun, Corrie V. Hunt, Matthew Lebo, Todd K. Hartman and Christine von Rhein. Their work appears in journals such as Political Psychology, Social Science Quarterly, Political Behavior, American Journal of Political Science and Political Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact