Geneva Jonathan

13 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Geneva Jonathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Applied Psychology 210
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Clinical Psychology 38
Replace Briana Cloutier with:
Briana Cloutier Canada
Crystal Samson Canada
Timothy Devitt United States
Panagiotis Spanakis United Kingdom
Gina Chinnery Australia
Sophie Walsh United Kingdom
Wike Seekles Netherlands
Puffin O’Hanlon United Kingdom
Fanny Kählke Germany
Eoin Golden United Kingdom
Geneva Jonathan relative to Briana Cloutier Canada Briana Cloutier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Briana Cloutier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geneva Jonathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geneva Jonathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geneva Jonathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geneva Jonathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geneva Jonathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geneva Jonathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geneva Jonathan. The network helps show where Geneva Jonathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Geneva Jonathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geneva Jonathan Line = papers co-authored together Geneva Jonathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2018130
2 201644
3 201836
4 202127
5 201724
6 202218
7 201718
8 201912
9 202111
10 202110
11 20217
12 20244
13 20243
14 20260
15 20250

About Geneva Jonathan

Geneva Jonathan is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (1 paper) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (210 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations) and Clinical Psychology (38 citations). Geneva Jonathan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dror Ben‐Zeev, Rachel Brian, Elizabeth Carpenter–Song, Robert E. Drake, Lisa A. Razzano, Emily A. Scherer, Kelly A. Aschbrenner, Sandra Steingard, Evan H Goulding and David C. Mohr. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, JMIR Mental Health, Psychiatric Services, Asian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavior Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact