Gemma Taylor

405 citations
18 papers · 206 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma Taylor

17 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Gemma Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 50
  • Education 113
  • Human-Computer Interaction 14
  • Information Systems 54
  • Gender Studies 17
Replace Alecia Moser with:
Alecia Moser United States
Lauren J. Myers United States
Nicole S. Fenty United States
Wan Ahmad Jaafar Wan Yahaya Malaysia
Mona Sakr United Kingdom
Hoda Ehsan United States
Cecilia Wallerstedt Sweden
Mukaddes Erdem Türkiye
Jonathan Savage United Kingdom
Olga Fotakopoulou United Kingdom
Gemma Taylor relative to Alecia Moser United States Alecia Moser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Alecia Moser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Taylor. The network helps show where Gemma Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201760
2 202028
3 201219
4 202416
5 202214
6 201413
7 196913
8 201310
9 202210
10
Multiple variable cues in the environment promote accurate and robust word learning
20175
11 20144
12 20233
13 20223
14 20163
15 20232
16 20222
17 20231
18 20150

About Gemma Taylor

Gemma Taylor is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Development and Digital Technology (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (50 citations), Education (113 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (14 citations), Information Systems (54 citations) and Gender Studies (17 citations). Gemma Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Padraic Monaghan, Gert Westermann, Joanna Kołak, Jane S. Herbert, Sarah Norgate, Chris Brown, Peter Gerhardstein, Alecia Moser, Jamie Lingwood and Kelly Dickerson. Their work appears in journals such as Infant Behavior and Development, Journal of Children and Media, Educational Research Review, Journal of Child Language and Journal of Applied Polymer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact