Gemma Lancaster

12 papers receiving 454 citations

Gemma Lancaster's Hit Papers

Surrogate data for hypothesis testing of physical systems 2018 · 275 citations
2750+2+5Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Gemma Lancaster
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 146
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 65
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 66
  • Signal Processing 34
Replace Valentina Ticcinelli with:
Valentina Ticcinelli United Kingdom
Aleksandra Pidde Spain
Olga Nikolaevna Pavlova Russia
Jaromír Kukal Czechia
Dmytro Iatsenko United Kingdom
Yuri Shiogai United Kingdom
Kang K. L. Liu United States
I. Balla Hungary
Alfonso Delgado-Bonal United States
M. Lauk Germany
Gemma Lancaster relative to Valentina Ticcinelli United Kingdom Valentina Ticcinelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Valentina Ticcinelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Lancaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Lancaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Lancaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Lancaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Lancaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Lancaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Lancaster. The network helps show where Gemma Lancaster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma Lancaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma Lancaster Line = papers co-authored together Gemma Lancaster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Surrogate data for hypothesis testing of physical systems
Hit paper breakdown →
2018275
2 201650
3 201530
4 201623
5 202017
6 201816
7 201913
8 198711
9 20247
10 20237
11 20245
12 20155

About Gemma Lancaster

Gemma Lancaster is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 12 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (1 paper), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper) and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (146 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (50 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (65 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (66 citations) and Signal Processing (34 citations). Gemma Lancaster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Aneta Stefanovska, Valentina Ticcinelli, Dmytro Iatsenko, Aleksandra Pidde, P. V. E. McClintock, Raffaele Pingitore, Bernard Meglič, Jan Kobal, Marco Rossi and Barbara Loggini. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Brain Communications, The Journal of Physiology, Physiological Measurement and Physics Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact