Gemma E. Newby

908 citations
27 papers · 807 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Gemma E. Newby

26 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

Gemma E. Newby
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Biomaterials 223
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122
  • Radiation 64
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 61
  • Organic Chemistry 120
Replace U. P. Fringeli with:
U. P. Fringeli Switzerland
Dmytro Soloviov Russia
Heli K. Lehtivuori Finland
Estelle Mossou France
Pavan K. Challa United Kingdom
Bruno Bellina United Kingdom
Ken Morishima Japan
Marianna Ambrico Italy
Stefano Casalini Italy
Philip D. Laible United States
Gemma E. Newby relative to U. P. Fringeli Switzerland U. P. Fringeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
U. P. Fringeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma E. Newby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma E. Newby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma E. Newby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma E. Newby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma E. Newby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma E. Newby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma E. Newby. The network helps show where Gemma E. Newby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gemma E. Newby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gemma E. Newby Line = papers co-authored together Gemma E. Newby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010124
2 2016101
3 200869
4 201761
5 201056
6 201756
7 201647
8 201140
9 201737
10 201733
11 201632
12 201720
13 201419
14 201018
15 201918
16 201515
17 200814
18 201910
19 20159
20 20227

About Gemma E. Newby

Gemma E. Newby is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biomaterials, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Organic Chemistry, having authored 27 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (7 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (4 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (223 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (122 citations), Radiation (64 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (61 citations) and Organic Chemistry (120 citations). Gemma E. Newby has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian William Hamley, Valeria Castelletto, Laurence Noirez, Nicholas J. Terrill, Michaël Wulff, Christopher M. Martin, Stephen M. King, Dmitry Khakhulin, Matthijs R. Panman and Andreas Menzel. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Soft Matter, Chemical Communications, Polymer Chemistry and Biomacromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact